Skip to content
Hansen IP Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Practice Areas
    • About the Firm
    • About the Attorneys
    • About the Paralegals
  • Articles
  • News
  • Patents
  • Blog
  • Contact

Tag: Statutory Subject Matter

Patent Invalidity, Patentability

Patenting Computer-Implemented Inventions May Have Gotten Easier

May 6, 2019stevehansenpatent eligibility, Statutory Subject Matter

In recent years, it has become increasingly difficult to patent computer-related inventions such as those concerning smart phone and web applications or even more specialized computer programs used in industry.  The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been applying the US
Read More

Invalidity, Patent Invalidity, Patentability

Software Patents Continue to Take a Beating in 2014

December 11, 2014December 11, 2014stevehansennon-practicing entities, NPEs, Statutory Subject Matter

This has not been a good year for software patents in the United States. Since the Supreme Court issued its decision in June in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014), the Patent Office has been aggressively rejecting software patent
Read More

Patent Invalidity

Are Business Method Patents Dead? – Supreme Court Strikes Down Patent Claims Directed to Computerized Method of “Intermediated Settlement”

June 24, 2014stevehansenBusiness Methods, Statutory Subject Matter

If business method patents are not dead, after this month’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, they are at least on life support. For a copy of the opinion, click here. In Alice Corp., the Supreme Court affirmed an en
Read More

Invalidity, Patentability

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Isolated Genes Are Not Eligible for Patent Protection

June 17, 2013stevehansenStatutory Subject Matter

In a long-awaited decision in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al., the U.S. Supreme Court held on June 13, 2013 that naturally-occurring, isolated genes are not patentable because they do not constitute patentable subject matter under
Read More

Invalidity, Patentability

Are Business Methods Really Patentable in the United States?

May 20, 2013stevehansenBusiness Methods, patentability, Statutory Subject Matter

Well, we thought so, but now we are not so sure.  It seems that the much more is required than the business method itself in order to obtain a patent.  The cases suggest that, at a minimum, novel computing features are required. 
Read More

Patent Preparation and Prosecution, Patents

Patenting of Games

November 13, 2012stevehansenStatutory Subject Matter

Growing up in a pre-cable TV world, I played a lot of games such as Monopoly, Clue, Life, Chutes & Ladders, Checkers, Chess and countless others.  With all of the cases coming out about statutory subject matter in the last few years,
Read More

Patents

Isolated Genes are Patent Eligible – At Least for Now

August 20, 2012August 19, 2012stevehansenStatutory Subject Matter

The courts continue to wrestle with the difficult question of what types of things can be patented (i.e., what constitutes statutory subject matter).   Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its post-remand opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al.,
Read More

Patent Preparation and Prosecution, Patents

Software Patentability- The Federal Circuit Giveth . . . and Taketh Away

July 30, 2012July 28, 2012stevehansenStatutory Subject Matter

In a recent newsletter, we discussed CLS Bank Int’l, et al. v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. (Case No. 2011-1301)(Fed. Cir. 2012) and the Federal Circuit’s efforts to provide guidance as to the patentability of software in the wake of the Supreme Court’s
Read More

Cases in the News, Patent Litigation, Patents

Yahoo v. Facebook–Facebook Returns Fire

April 9, 2012April 6, 2012stevehansenPatent litigation, Statutory Subject Matter

On April 3 Facebook answered Yahoo’s patent infringement complaint in the pending lawsuit in the Northern District of California.  As many people predicted, Facebook also alleged patent infringement claims against Yahoo based on 10 of Facebook’s patents.  We discussed Yahoo’s patents and
Read More

Cases in the News, Invalidity, Patent Litigation

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories—The Unanswered Questions

March 26, 2012March 24, 2012stevehansenStatutory Subject Matter3 Comments

As a follow-up to our original post on the Prometheus case, we did a search to see if there were other patents related to the ones struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, i.e., U.S. Patent No. 6,355,623 and 6,680,302.  These patents
Read More

Posts pagination

1 2 Next

Categories

Archives

Tags

AIA (4) America Invents Act (4) America Invents Act (AIA) (2) Business Methods (2) claim construction (7) copyright (2) cosmetics (1) Damages (2) declaratory judgment (3) design patents (4) direct Infringement (2) discovery (4) divided infringement (3) enablement (5) expedited examination (2) foreign patents (2) hair care (1) Indefiniteness (4) Inducement of Infringement (4) inequitable conduct (2) interrogatories (2) inventorship (3) non-obviousness (2) non-practicing entities (2) NPEs (2) obviousness (2) patent (3) patentability (8) patent invalidity (6) patent lawyer (1) Patent litigation (13) Patent Ownership (2) patent portfolio development (6) patent prosecution (7) patents (7) patent search (3) provisional patent application (2) reexamination (3) right to use (2) software (3) Statutory Subject Matter (12) trade dress (2) willful infringement (3) written description (3) written description requirement (2)

Recent Posts

  • Carefully Consider the Actors and Likely Implementations of Web-Based Systems You Seek to Patent
    by stevehansen
    January 27, 2025
  • Developing Your Invention
    by stevehansen
    December 23, 2024

Tag Cloud

Claim Construction (13) Infringement (13) Invalidity (26) Patentability (17) Patent Infringement (7) Patent Invalidity (13) Patent Litigation (40) Patent Preparation and Prosecution (36) Patents (42) Portfolio Development and Innovation (37) Reexamination and Post Grant Review (6)

Contact Info

Our Location:

PO Box 300069,
Waterford, MI 48330


Contact Info:

Phone: (248) 504-4849
Fax: (248) 504-4213
[email protected]

Contact Form

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright © 2022 Hansen IP Law. All Rights Reserved.

Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes

Request a Quote